unfreezeGabriel Lopez

Porck & van Knippenberg (2022), Journal of Management Studies

An Integrative Model of the Role of Structural, Behavioural, and Cognitive Coordination in Intergroup Effectiveness: How Middle Managers Play a Role

Middle managers' boundary spanning and shared understanding of strategy between teams could substitute for structural coordination, and the two strengthened each other's association with how well interdependent teams performed together, in multisource data on 188 intergroup dyads.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Not tied to one part of the Loop. It describes the middle more broadly.
Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and provisional until an independent human coder checks it. Spot an error? Email [email protected] and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Lauche & Erez (2022)Middle managers' discontent could energize, not only inhibit, upward issue selling for strategic renewal, especially when sellers and recipients took each other's perspective; the exchanges took three forms: productive confrontation, avoiding escalation and collective moaning.Wilden et al. (2022)Middle and senior managers chose innovation projects differently, especially radical ones: middle managers weighed internal resources such as social capital and know-how, while senior managers focused on external knowledge.Van Doorn et al. (2022)Automation alone was not significantly related to middle managers' strategic involvement; the link depended on which tasks were automated and on position tenure, with reporting automation going with more involvement for short-tenured managers and budgeting automation going with less for short-tenured but more for long-tenured managers.Greven et al. (2022)Middle managers' specialized education, managerial ties and trust were linked to more product ambidexterity, while solidarity was linked to less.