van Dam et al. (2021), Journal of Change Management

The Impact of Middle Managers on Employees’ Responses to a Merger: An LMX and Appraisal Theory Approach

Name: Atlas of the Middle summary and grade: van Dam et al. (2021)
Item: The Impact of Middle Managers on Employees’ Responses to a Merger: An LMX and Appraisal Theory Approach
Rating: 2

Employees with better relationships with their manager reported more change information and chances to participate, felt more positively about the merger, and were more open to it.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Surface both waysSupports Start it close to the workSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and provisional until an independent human coder checks it. Spot an error? Email [email protected] and it gets fixed.

Related studies

den Nieuwenboer et al. (2017)Facing goals the authors describe as unrealistic, middle managers in a telecom desk-sales unit pushed their reps to game how sales were recorded, so real orders were misattributed and reported results overstated; upper management then cut the field sales force on the strength of those figures.Currie et al. (2015)In hospital care for older people, nurse middle managers could pass knowledge down to fellow nurses but struggled to pass it up the hierarchy or across to doctors; without HR support, the authors warn, a 'broken' rather than 'broker' chain may result.Ahearne et al. (2014)Middle managers' influence on those above them related to unit performance along a curve rather than a straight line, and it paid off more for managers with a strong reputation in their networks.Huy (2011)In a three-year case at a large tech firm, executives treating strategy as a purely task-focused job unintentionally stirred middle managers' group identities around tenure and language; the resulting emotions saw managers, even ones executives promoted, back or quietly brush off an initiative.