Home / Team norms and working agreement template
Template
Team norms and working agreement template
Team norms are the shared expectations for how a team works together, whether or not anyone has written them down. Writing them down as a working agreement makes them something the team can check and change, not something new members have to guess.
By Gabriel Lopez · Updated October 26, 2026 · Every source is listed at the end
Fill in the template
Team working agreement
One row per norm. Write what the norm looks like in practice, so anyone could tell whether it is being kept. It saves only in this browser, on this device, and is never sent anywhere.
Plain-text version to copy or print
TEAM WORKING AGREEMENT Norm What it looks like in practice How we will notice if it slips 1. Norm: ______________________ What it looks like in practice: ______________________ How we will notice if it slips: ______________________ 2. Norm: ______________________ What it looks like in practice: ______________________ How we will notice if it slips: ______________________ 3. Norm: ______________________ What it looks like in practice: ______________________ How we will notice if it slips: ______________________ 4. Norm: ______________________ What it looks like in practice: ______________________ How we will notice if it slips: ______________________ 5. Norm: ______________________ What it looks like in practice: ______________________ How we will notice if it slips: ______________________
Get the editable version: this template as a Word file with a worked example, in the Change Toolkit. Or learn to use it on your own change in the course Leading Change with Evidence.
How to use it well
These steps are practice suggestions, not tested findings.
Write them together. Ask each person to write down one thing that helps the team work well and one thing that gets in the way. Group the answers, then turn them into norms. If the manager writes them alone, they are the manager's rules, not the team's.
Make each norm observable. "We respect each other" cannot be checked. "We let people finish before responding" can. The second column on the template is there to force that step.
Include the uncomfortable ones. The norms that matter most during a change are about raising problems, disagreeing with the boss and admitting mistakes. If the list has none of these, ask why.
Keep it short. A short list the team actually uses beats a long one on a poster.
Check them on a rhythm. At each regular review, ask which norm slipped and what made it slip. Change the norm or the conditions, not only the people.
Show new members. A written agreement saves new members from having to guess the rules.
What the research says
No study in the Evidence Library behind this site tests writing team norms or a working agreement, so treat this template as a practical tool. The nearest evidence is on psychological safety, the belief that a team is safe for interpersonal risks such as speaking up (see psychological safety).
A small, tested gain from team sessions. In a cluster-randomized trial of 56 hybrid work teams (478 people), teams that took part in two coach-led sessions using team-regulatory strategies reported more support for flexible work and slightly higher psychological safety than waitlist teams, and the gain in psychological safety held at 9 weeks (Althammer et al., 2025, rated Medium in the Evidence Library after a full-text read). In raw terms the change in psychological safety was tiny, and all measures were self-rated.
Listening as a norm. Across five studies by the same authors (744 people), being listened to by a supervisor was associated with more creativity, partly through psychological safety; in their vignette experiment the effect was small (Castro et al., 2018, rated Medium after a full-text read). A norm about listening is a reasonable bet on that evidence, not a proven one.
A short manager training did not change fairness ratings overall. In a cluster-randomized trial of 46 departments, a 90-minute training for managers did not change subordinates' overall ratings of organizational justice, or fairness, at 3 months (Nakamura et al., 2016, rated High after a full-text read). A single session is unlikely to be enough by itself, so the template adds a checking column and a regular review. That is a practice suggestion, not a tested finding.
How it maps to the Unfrozen Loop
- Week 0Before you start
- 1Surface both ways
- 2Make sense together, top included
- 3Start it close to the work
- 4Review on a rhythm, then hold the pace
Check the agreement at your regular review. Ask which norm slipped this cycle and what made it slip.
- 5The middle’s own weather
- RingSafe to speak, and speaking changes something
Norms about raising problems and disagreeing are the culture ring written down. The ring asks two things, whether it is safe to speak and whether speaking changes something, so write a norm for each.
Highlighted parts are the ones this idea speaks to. The mapping is my reading, not a tested finding. See the whole Loop and the evidence for each part.
Free lesson: Module 0 of Leading Change with Evidence, about 50 minutes.
Common questions
What are examples of good team norms?
We raise problems as soon as we see them. We disagree in the meeting, not after it. Meetings start on time and end with owners and dates. We reply to messages within one working day. Anyone can ask why. Each is only useful if the team writes what it looks like in practice.
What is the difference between team norms and a team charter?
A charter sets out what the team is for: purpose, outcomes, scope, roles and decisions. Norms set out how members behave day to day. A short list of norms can sit inside the charter.
Do team norms improve psychological safety?
The evidence is thin. In a randomized trial of 56 hybrid work teams, two coach-led sessions in which teams worked on team-regulatory strategies for their hybrid work raised self-rated psychological safety by a small amount that held at 9 weeks; the raw change was tiny. No study in the Evidence Library behind this site tests writing norms down as such.
Related
Sources
Entries marked (full text read) were checked against the full paper by the Evidence Library read.
- Althammer, S. E., Wöhrmann, A. M., & Michel, A. (2025). The effectiveness of a team intervention to enhance team regulation in hybrid teams: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2025.2562306 (full text read)
- Castro, D. R., Anseel, F., Kluger, A. N., Lloyd, K. J., & Turjeman-Levi, Y. (2018). Mere listening effect on creativity and the mediating role of psychological safety. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000177 (full text read)
- Nakamura, S., Somemura, H., Sasaki, N., Yamamoto, M., Tanaka, M., & Tanaka, K. (2016). Effect of management training in organizational justice: A randomized controlled trial. Industrial Health, 54(3), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0164 (full text read)