Azambuja & Islam (2023), Journal of Management Studies

Middle‐Managerial Deviance as a Response to Structural Strain: Rescoping, Reconfiguring and Replacing Norms

Name: Atlas of the Middle summary and grade: Azambuja & Islam (2023)
Item: Middle‐Managerial Deviance as a Response to Structural Strain: Rescoping, Reconfiguring and Replacing Norms
Rating: 2

Middle managers deviated from norms when organizational rules clashed with on-the-ground work; their deviance could adapt or replace norms and fed into new norm formation while expanding their own power.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Start it close to the workMixed The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and provisional until an independent human coder checks it. Spot an error? Email [email protected] and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Letierce et al. (2023)Middle managers freed from administrative work and backed by structure and top management adapted the prescribed strategy to local conditions and empowered their front-line teams.Splitter et al. (2021)When a company opened strategy making to front-line employees, middle managers' traditional role as strategists was undermined, and they took different routes to reclaim it over time.Li & Makino (2025)Fear pushed middle managers both toward inertia and toward change; treating them as partners, with independence from assessment, in decision making and from structural constraints, reduced rigidity by reshaping those fears.Larsson & Holmberg (2021)Middle managers reinterpreted, prioritized and embedded a standardized employee survey to create space for local change, and their considerable effort was what made the survey useful.