Van Niekerk & Jansen van Rensburg (2022), Journal of Change Management

Middle Managers’ Strategising Practices to Effect Strategic Change

Name: Atlas of the Middle summary and grade: Van Niekerk & Jansen van Rensburg (2022)
Item: Middle Managers’ Strategising Practices to Effect Strategic Change
Rating: 1

Professional middle managers in a restructuring university used six strategising practices, shaped by cognitive and emotional experience as both implementers and recipients of change.

Parts of the Loop it informs

The middle's own weatherSupports

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and provisional until an independent human coder checks it. Spot an error? Email [email protected] and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Hassard & Morris (2021)Middle managers reported their working time stretching inside the workplace and extending into voluntary work from outside it; the authors link this to lean, agile and reengineering prescriptions and to digital communication tools, and argue that strategic and political choices also shape it.Splitter et al. (2021)When a company opened strategy making to front-line employees, middle managers' traditional role as strategists was undermined, and they took different routes to reclaim it over time.Kim et al. (2021)Middle managers who saw their CEO as narcissistic reported more uncertainty, especially when COVID-19 threatened the firm, and that uncertainty went with more laissez-faire leadership and impression management; an online experiment with working adults supported the model.Azambuja & Islam (2023)Middle managers deviated from norms when organizational rules clashed with on-the-ground work; their deviance could adapt or replace norms and fed into new norm formation while expanding their own power.