Tenhiälä et al. (2025), Human Resource Management

Between Consistency and Adaptation: How Middle Managers Shape Compensation System Implementation

Name: Atlas of the Middle summary and grade: Tenhiälä et al. (2025)
Item: Between Consistency and Adaptation: How Middle Managers Shape Compensation System Implementation
Rating: 2

Middle managers and employees blamed compensation-system problems on different causes; how much managers identified with the system and felt agency explained whether they championed, complied, adapted or resigned.

Parts of the Loop it informs

Start it close to the workMixed

Read the original paper

Summary written by Unfrozen from the published abstract, then checked twice against the source. Loop coding is exploratory and provisional until an independent human coder checks it. Spot an error? Email [email protected] and it gets fixed.

Related studies

Li & Makino (2025)Fear pushed middle managers both toward inertia and toward change; treating them as partners, with independence from assessment, in decision making and from structural constraints, reduced rigidity by reshaping those fears.Alao et al. (2026)Middle managers resolved commensalistic resource tensions through peer-level deals that let several initiatives share ecosystem resources, while rivalrous tensions drew in senior managers, who either restricted an initiative's access or, working with middle managers, kept resources shared across initiatives.Supriharyanti et al. (2024)Middle managers' empowering leadership was linked to team psychological capital, which carried the link to teams' learning capability for change but not to their process or context capability.Azambuja & Islam (2023)Middle managers deviated from norms when organizational rules clashed with on-the-ground work; their deviance could adapt or replace norms and fed into new norm formation while expanding their own power.